Shmoop.com
Highly Credible
4
|
3
|
Credible
2
|
1
|
Discreditable
O
|
Authoritative
|
Highly-regarded site that is referenced and linked to by others. Information is well-referenced, cited and written by authors with expertise in the content area
|
Well regarded side that is well known in its category. Information is referenced and cited, with exports generating content
|
Regarded site that has reputable information that is referenced and cited
|
Site is slightly regarded-does not necessarily have information that is Research and referenced, cited
|
site is not regarded information or resources provided are not researched, referenced, or cited
|
Educational
Value
|
Site is leading source of content that exceeds instructional goals
|
Site is a regarded source of content that meets instructional goals
|
Site content meets instructional goals
|
Site content does not meet instructional goals
|
Site content is inappropriate or actively subvertes instructional goals
|
Intent
|
site is a highly respected source of content provided to inform users
|
Site is a well- regarded source of information whose job is to inform
|
Site provides content to inform users
|
site promotes content; the goal of the site is not to “inform” “inform” users
|
Site actively sells content
|
Originality
|
Site is a primary source of original content and viewpoints
|
Site offers original content and viewpoints
|
Site offers
original content combining it with repurposed content
|
Site aggregates or repurposed content
|
Site aggregates or repurposes content without appropriate citation for references
|
Quality
|
Site content is high quality (vetted, researched, and informed) and enough content is provided to establish good coverage
|
Site content is of good quality and there is a good content area coverage
|
Site content is of quality and there is a some broader content coverage
|
Site content quality is lacking and good content is in limited quantity
|
Quality of content is questionable. Lack of quality information available
|
Cliffsnotes.com
Highly Credible
4
|
3
|
Credible
2
|
1
|
Discreditable
O
|
Authoritative
|
Highly-regarded site that is referenced and linked to by others. Information is well-referenced, cited and written by authors with expertise in the content area
|
Well regarded side that is well known in its category. Information is referenced and cited, with exports generating content
|
Regarded site that has reputable information that is referenced and cited
|
Site is slightly regarded-does not necessarily have information that is Research and referenced, cited
|
site is not regarded information or resources provided are not researched, referenced, or cited
|
Educational
Value
|
Site is leading source of content that exceeds instructional goals
|
Site is a regarded source of content that meets instructional goals
|
Site content meets instructional goals
|
Site content does not meet instructional goals
|
Site content is inappropriate or actively subvertes instructional goals
|
Intent
|
site is a highly respected source of content provided to inform users
|
Site is a well- regarded source of information whose job is to inform
|
Site provides content to inform users
|
site promotes content; the goal of the site is not to “inform” “inform” users
|
Site actively sells content
|
Originality
|
Site is a primary source of original content and viewpoints
|
Site offers original content and viewpoints
|
Site offers
original content combining it with repurposed content
|
Site aggregates or repurposed content
|
Site aggregates or repurposes content without appropriate citation for references
|
Quality
|
Site content is high quality (vetted, researched, and informed) and enough content is provided to establish good coverage
|
Site content is of good quality and there is a good content area coverage
|
Site content is of quality and there is a some broader content coverage
|
Site content quality is lacking and good content is in limited quantity
|
Quality of content is questionable. Lack of quality information available
|
Literarydevice.com
Highly Credible
4
|
3
|
Credible
2
|
1
|
Discreditable
O
|
Authoritative
|
Highly-regarded site that is referenced and linked to by others. Information is well-referenced, cited and written by authors with expertise in the content area
|
Well regarded side that is well known in its category. Information is referenced and cited, with exports generating content
|
Regarded site that has reputable information that is referenced and cited
|
Site is slightly regarded-does not necessarily have information that is Research and referenced, cited
|
site is not regarded information or resources provided are not researched, referenced, or cited
|
Educational
Value
|
Site is leading source of content that exceeds instructional goals
|
Site is a regarded source of content that meets instructional goals
|
Site content meets instructional goals
|
Site content does not meet instructional goals
|
Site content is inappropriate or actively subvertes instructional goals
|
Intent
|
site is a highly respected source of content provided to inform users
|
Site is a well- regarded source of information whose job is to inform
|
Site provides content to inform users
|
site promotes content; the goal of the site is not to “inform” “inform” users
|
Site actively sells content
|
Originality
|
Site is a primary source of original content and viewpoints
|
Site offers original content and viewpoints
|
Site offers
original content combining it with repurposed content
|
Site aggregates or repurposed content
|
Site aggregates or repurposes content without appropriate citation for references
|
Quality
|
Site content is high quality (vetted, researched, and informed) and enough content is provided to establish good coverage
|
Site content is of good quality and there is a good content area coverage
|
Site content is of quality and there is a some broader content coverage
|
Site content quality is lacking and good content is in limited quantity
|
Quality of content is questionable. Lack of quality information available
|
No comments:
Post a Comment